Sunday, February 26, 2012

Thoughts

Like many Americans, I am upset by the divisive and polarized tone in our politics.  Not only regarding foreign policy, but also social issues like contraception, marriage equality, education, and immigration.  I think it is natural for Americans to have healthy disagreement of the issues - to critically evaluate and speak their opinions.  But in order to be a society that is "the best of us" we need to learn how to listen and use all that we have - our hearts, minds, and souls - to express ourselves and influence policies that affect all of us. 

I think it requires us to ask ourselves - who do we want to be?  Do we want to be a country that is intolerant, hateful, judgemental, and fearful?  Or do we want to be a country that respects differences and recognizes the underlying humanity in these differences?   I think there are some who would argue that preserving "core principles" or "values" are what the "founding fathers" would want.  But this is really code for Christian ideology - and in my opinion, annoyingly condescending, not to mention presumptuous.  The funny thing is - that what these same people don't understand is that Christian ideology varies from Christian to Christian, and at the heart of it, in my opinion, is "love thy neighbor."  Which by the way is a fundamental principle in Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and Judaism. 

“...and you should forgive And overlook: Do you not like God to forgive you? And Allah is The Merciful Forgiving.”
Qur’an (Surah 24, "The Light," v. 22)

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.
Christians do not have the monopoly on love, forgiveness, or even sinfulness.  It bothers me that so many in the public use Christianity as a means to judge everyone else.  For example, I don't understand how making marriage equality legal hurts anyone.  How does it hurt you if you are Christian?  The law is not saying that if you are a man and a woman you can no longer marry.  It doesn't take away anyones rights, or infringe on any of your personal beliefs.  It isn't forcing you to do anything or believe anything.  It doesn't diminish your marriage, does it?  Does it make your marriage weaker in the eyes of God?  Does it make your wedding vows any less meaningful?  I doubt it.  So what you are saying, is that the legal right to marry in this country has to be your way or the highway because God made it so.  So there we are - forcing religious beliefs on people and using Christianity to do it.  
Sure, our "founding fathers" invoked religion in the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and U.S. Constitution.  That was the overwhelming culture of white middle-aged men in the late 1700's.  Let's face it, we weren't known for our overwhelming diversity back then.  But our country has changed and grown better for taking the poor, huddled masses from around the world.  We are more (I hope) enlightened about other cultures, faiths, and people, and with this enlightenment we have the sharing of ideas, creativity, and innovation, that make this country stronger. 

Currently our nation is going through "growing pains."  Those that want us to hold on so tight to our Christian beginnings, that they condemn people with different views because they feel it threatens who they thing they are individually.  It is a shame.  There is a difference between practicing your religion and forcing your beliefs on others.  In fact, I think that is what the most recent debate over contraception and the Catholic church was about.  In that case, it was the government who was telling Catholic institutions they had to support contraception for their employees.  Regardless of what you think about the health care part of it, as a Constitutional issue, in my view, there was a line being crossed.  Unfortunately, what I keep hearing in the political rhetoric particularly from the GOP, is a shift from freedom of religion to religious institutions and organization forcing their beliefs on the public - instituting those beliefs into law - think about the abortion debate. 
Rick Santorum on ABC's This Week
“I don’t believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute. The idea that the church can have no influence or no involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country,” said Santorum. “This is the First Amendment. The First Amendment says the free exercise of religion. That means bringing everybody, people of faith and no faith, into the public square. Kennedy for the first time articulated the vision saying, no, ‘faith is not allowed in the public square. I will keep it separate.’ Go on and read the speech ‘I will have nothing to do with faith. I won’t consult with people of faith.’ It was an absolutist doctrine that was foreign at the time of 1960,” he said.
This is actually what the first amendment to the Bill of Rights says:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It is talking about the free exercise of religion, not forcing everyone to believe the same thing.  There is a difference.  I am all about freedom of religion all religion, or no religion - that is the point - the point that some members of the Republican Party ignore. 
To me, getting at the "heart" of Christian values looks like this:


Again, it comes back to "love thy neighbor."  Not, judge thy neighbor, or hate thy neighbor, or condemn thy neighbor, or condescend to thy neighbor. 

Recently the Koran was burned in Afghanistan.  However inadvertent, it was wrong.  And because of this, those responsible including the military and ultimately the President, on behalf of the US, should apologize and they did. 

But now, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, along with other GOP pundits are saying that this apology was a mistake - that it makes us look weak.  I can't understand this.  How can prominent politicians stand up and say that the government should not apologize for the burning of a religious text?  A book that means so much to so many people?  What if the role was reversed?  What if it was the bible that was burned?  Would they have expected an apology from those that perpetrated the burning?  There is no logic in this kind of thought, only intolerance and short-sightedness.  It is a tragedy that anyone has died over this incident, and by spouting off like they have, they only do a disservice to everyone in Afghanistan working to bring peace.  It is shameful and irresponsible to make these comments because there are people who will listen to them and believe them, who follow every word they say even if it doesn't make sense.  It only goes to widen the gap of intolerance, not build a bridge between people. 

Sorry for the long ramble, it has been working around in my head for awhile.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Excellent post, H. Thank you. I have been watching the Republican campaign with great sadness (and anger), and you touch on a lot of good questions raised about the motivations and goals of some of these candidates (and their supporters). The Christianity they proclam is not the Christianity I know, and it is painful to watch it being used in such a way.

my mind wanders said...

Kate, I couldn't agree more, and like you, it makes me sad and angry as I listen to it. Thanks for the comment!! I read on your blog about february and I agree with you there!

Anonymous said...

Very thoughtful and well stated--with historical insight and fact to back it up. I do not think what is happening today is at all what our founding fathers intended. They, and many of those here before them, certainly had experienced or knew about the worst kinds of persecution, in the name of righteous religion, in the countries they fled. They also knew the value of negotiation and compromise for the best interests of all and the future of the country they were building a foundation for. You are correct that they were not always as tolerant or capable of seeing all people as equal, but they were certainly trying to build a fair foundation. As the country has evolved there should be more tolerance and understanding, not less. Today's politics seem incapable of flexibility, compromise, change when new information is received, etc. Instead they have blinders on as they travel a very narrow, inflexible path---to what one wonders.
I am so glad to have had the benefit of your thoughts as I try to deal with our current situation.

Virginia Gal said...

H! What a lovely post - thank you for the inclusion of Islam and showing that we are a forgiving lot as well as the Christians.

You put a good point on it, we are at a growing pains as a nation.

KarimY said...

I appreciate your respect for other religions in general and Islam specifically


Great article

Nicholas said...

You begin by denouncing the polarization in our country and criticizing the political process.

This I agree with.

But your rant against Christianity and the Right only serves to increase the very polarization you mention earlier in your post.

Overall you have an interesting blog though. I'd appreciate it if you checked out mine, I have a post in regards to this very same polarization in our country and how pragmatism is the key to solving this problem.

http://comsenworld.blogspot.com/2012/04/leftist-college-professors-and-my.html

Sharon Will said...

There should be a Freedom of Religion to all. And in fact, all religions are good- all teach great virtues and how to live a moral life.

Sharon for Video Productie Services Belgie

Jen said...

What a great post. You put your thoughts together beautifully. It's helped me organize mine and I thank you for sharing.

hotels in pachmarhi said...

This kind of post always improve my spirit in getting more subscriber. Good one
pachmarhi hotels
best hotel in pachmarhi
pachmarhi

Anonymous said...

visit www.euro2012junkies.blogspot.com

for information regarding euro 2012

Jenefer Maron said...

Today I went online and found your blog really amazing, I think you have an amazing creativity I am happy to learn from you even can't be met in the real world.
Family Portrait Photographers

Unknown said...

great one

Unknown said...

I am upset by the divisive and polarized tone in our politics too...

It's big problem..

www.paperwritings.com

Bridal lehenga said...

Right away, you will need to suffer liberal to go off in every location simply because moncler clothing is likely to make you experience sexy and thus balmy all the spare time. Likewise the exact Moncler way down clothing goods isn't really contemporary, high end and clientele. Not often obtained seem damaged in regards towards the cooler off season any existing even more, Moncler Layers positively can invariably help you balmy outside of your personal property, the best moncler clothing each are targeted by working with a lot of quality and thus clothing fashion artwork.

Carla Hurst-Chandler said...

Well spoke!

We have met the enemy...and he is us.


Unknown said...

What a lovely blog, I really enjoyed reading it. I too have a new blog, and I would appreciate it if you could visit Γαστρεντερολόγοι στην Θεσσαλονίκη The blog provides information on various gastrointestinal diseases and has a forum with questions and answers for patients with problems of stomach, intestines, and liver.

Unknown said...

WOW! You will not believe! Visit our website and blogger promotions World and meet our promotions Spotlight: http://promocoesmundiais.blogspot.com.br/ and http://sitepromocoesmundiais.com.br/

ي said...

دردشه لبيه

-
بوابة الشمال

-

حرب التتار
-
شات حبي الصوتي
-
اخباريه القريات